Why SDRBO

Paying more should get you more room, not more permission.

Feature gating is a pricing tactic, not a product decision. It exists because a locked button is easy to sell against. SDRBO takes the other position: the product is the product, and the price scales with the size of the operation using it.

Typical tiered platformCapability unlocks
Starter
Professional
Business
Enterprise
The bill buys access
SDRBOVolume only
Solo
Small Team
Growing Team
Established and Enterprise
The bill buys capacity
The problem

What tiered software actually costs you

The list price is rarely the real price. The real price is the third upgrade, six months in, when the feature you needed all along turns out to live two tiers up.

COST 01

The workaround tax

Teams build spreadsheets, shared inboxes and manual checklists around a locked feature. The workaround becomes a process, the process becomes a habit, and the habit outlives the software that caused it.

COST 02

The upgrade cliff

You need one capability, such as custom fields, an audit log or a second pipeline. The only route is a tier that also multiplies your per-seat cost across everyone who never asked for it.

COST 03

The seat squeeze

Per-user pricing turns access into a budget decision. The warehouse lead, the bookkeeper and the part-time technician get left out, so the system stops reflecting what is actually happening.

COST 04

Metered AI resentment

Credits sold per seat, expiring monthly, with a hard stop halfway through a task. People learn to avoid the feature rather than risk burning the allowance, which is the opposite of why it was bought.

The rules

Four commitments we price around

These are structural, not promotional. They are the reason our pricing page lists ten usage numbers instead of four feature columns.

01. Every feature, every plan

If it ships, it ships to everyone. A one-person business on Solo gets custom objects, audit logs, automation, the API and the client portal. There is no contact sales to unlock.

02. Permissions are not a tier

Roles and granular permissions are safety equipment. Restricting who can see pay rates or delete a customer is available on the cheapest plan, because charging for it would mean charging for security.

03. Growth records are unlimited

Contacts, projects, tickets, invoices, learners and portal users are never capped. You are not penalized for keeping history, and never nudged to delete customers to stay under a line.

04. AI credits pool and never hard-stop

Credits belong to the workspace, not the seat. Simple tasks route to cheaper models automatically. When you run high, you buy more of that one resource rather than being cut off mid-month.

Side by side

Typical tiered SaaS compared with SDRBO

Comparison of typical tiered SaaS pricing with SDRBO
QuestionTypical tiered platformSDRBO
Who gets the full feature set?Top tier onlyEvery plan
What raises the bill?Unlocking capabilitySeats and monthly volume
Roles and permissionsMid or top tierIncluded everywhere
Audit log and record historyEnterprise add-onIncluded everywhere
Custom fields and objectsTier-limited countsIncluded everywhere
API accessHigher tierIncluded, metered by call volume
Client or customer portal usersBilled as usersUnlimited, never billed
AI usagePer-seat credits, hard stopPooled credits, buy more of that resource
Adding a part-time employeeFull-price seat$29 per month, on any plan
Contact or record capsCommon, tier-basedNone on core records
The trade

What you give up in return

No pricing model is free of trade-offs, and a page that claims otherwise is selling something. Here is the honest version of ours.

  • The entry price is higher than a stripped starter tier. Solo is $119, not $19, because it is the whole platform rather than a sample of it
  • The usage limits are real. If you send a hundred thousand campaign emails a month, you will be on a larger plan or buying capacity
  • We do not do everything. Payroll, accounting, inventory and enterprise BI are permanently out of scope, at every price
  • We are a young platform without a SOC 2 attestation yet, and we say so rather than hoping the question does not come up
If a cheaper stack genuinely fits your business better, we would rather tell you in the first conversation.
Fit

Who this is built for

  • Service businesses that sell, deliver, invoice and support the same customer
  • Companies running four to eight disconnected tools and paying to glue them together
  • Teams where non-desk staff need access but cannot justify a full CRM seat
  • Owners who want the bill to be predictable and the limits to be legible
  • Anyone who has been surprised by an upgrade quote in the last two years
Honesty

Who it is not for

  • Companies that need payroll processing or tax filing in the same system
  • Manufacturers needing shop-floor or inventory ERP
  • Call centers requiring advanced telephony routing
  • Analytics teams needing a warehouse and an enterprise BI layer
  • Anyone whose accounting must be authoritative inside the platform
Common questions

Straight answers

What does no feature gating actually mean?

It means the $119 Solo plan and the $3,499 Enterprise plan run identical software. Custom fields, custom record types, roles and permissions, audit logs, the client portal, the LMS, automation and the API are included at every price. No feature is withheld to create an upgrade path.

Then why would anyone buy a higher plan?

Capacity. Higher plans include more internal users and larger monthly pools for AI credits, automation runs, email, storage, e-sign requests, processing units and API calls. You move up when the operation gets bigger, not when you need a button unlocked.

Is this cheaper than the tools we run now?

Usually, for a team of about ten running four or more separate subscriptions. A comparable stack of CRM, project, proposal, billing, LMS, help desk, portal, forms and automation tools typically runs between $800 and $3,200 a month at list price, against $229 for SDRBO Small Team.

What stops you adding feature gates later?

Nothing legally, which is why it is worth judging on structure rather than promises. The pricing is built on ten published usage meters, so the levers we can pull are volume levers. Adding a capability paywall would mean rebuilding how the product is priced, not flipping a switch.

Do you offer a free plan?

No. A free tier is usually the most heavily gated version of a product, and maintaining it means the paid plans subsidise it. We would rather price the real thing honestly and show it to you before you commit.

Test the claim yourself

Ask us for the feature you assume is behind a paywall. Audit logs, custom objects, the API, the portal, permissions. We will show it running on the Solo plan.